China made its boldest overseas takeover move when state-owned ChemChina agreed a $43 billion bid for Swiss seeds and pesticides group Syngenta on Wednesday, aiming to improve domestic food production.
The largest ever foreign purchase by a Chinese firm, announced by both companies, will accelerate a shake-up in global agrochemicals and marks a setback for U.S. firm Monsanto, which failed to buy Syngenta last year.
China, the world’s largest agricultural market, is looking for ways to secure food supply for its population. Syngenta’s portfolio of top-tier chemicals, fertilizers and patent-protected seed varieties will represent a major upgrade of its potential output.
“Only around 10 percent of Chinese farmland is efficient. This is more than just a company buying another. This is a government attempting to address a real problem,” a source close to the deal told Reuters.
Years of intensive farming combined with overuse of chemicals has degraded land and poisoned water supplies, leaving China increasingly vulnerable to crop shortages. The deal fits into Chinese government plans to modernize its agriculture over the next five years.
With growth slowing at home, Chinese companies are looking abroad for deals that can boost their businesses. If completed, the Syngenta acquisition would be more than double CNOOC’s $17.7 billion purchase of Canadian energy company Nexen in 2012.
Shares in Syngenta rose on news of the deal, but at around 412 Swiss francs, were some way below the agreed offer price of $465 per share, equivalent to 480 francs, reflecting market concerns that the deal could yet stumble over regulatory hurdles and limited expectations of a counter-offer.
Syngenta CEO John Ramsay, who described the ChemChina offer as “very appropriate and attractive,” said he saw no major barriers and noted that ChemChina had secure financing in place.
A source with knowledge of the deal said the funding would come from a range of Chinese players, as well as HSBC and China CITIC Bank International.
“I think the overall regulatory approvals will not be very challenging,” Ramsay told Reuters, adding he expected antitrust regulators to acknowledge the limited overlap.
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), whose mandate is U.S. national security, would not pose a major hurdle, Ramsay said.
Swiss regulators said their conditions were largely met by the terms of the deal, although they want Swiss retail investors to receive the ChemChina offer in Swiss francs and warnings to be given on foreign exchange risks.
Syngenta’s board would still have to consider any rival offers, Ramsay said.
But ChemChina, short for China National Chemical Corp., has agreed to pay about $3 billion in fees should it fail to meet all requirements for the deal, while Syngenta will owe ChemChina about $1.5 billion if the deal falls through for any reasons the Swiss group is accountable for.
“The discussions between our two companies have been friendly, constructive and cooperative, and we are delighted that this collaboration has led to the agreement,” ChemChina Chairman Ren Jianxin said.
In a hint of what may be in store for the enlarged group, Syngenta’s chairman said ChemChina will be on the lookout for more deals as China strives to improve its food supply.
“ChemChina has a very ambitious vision of the industry in the future. Obviously it is very interested in securing food supply for 1.5 billion people and as a result knows that only technology can get them there,” Michel Demare said.
ChemChina’s move on Syngenta may be the biggest, but it is not the first as Chinese corporates shift offshore.
Similar deals include last year’s buyout of Italian tire maker Pirelli by ChemChina. In January, ChemChina announced the acquisition of German industrial machinery maker KraussMaffei Group for about $1 billion.
Beijing is keen to boost farming productivity as it seeks to cut reliance on food imports amid limited farm land, a growing population and higher meat consumption. China’s combined consumption of pork, beef and poultry has grown by an average 1.7 million tonnes a year for the past decade, placing further stress on feed grain supplies.
Meanwhile, a global glut of corn and soybeans has depressed grain prices for the past three years, prompting U.S. farmers to reduce spending on everything from equipment to seeds and pesticides. The cutbacks, along with pressure from investors and a desire to bolster profit, have sent many of the world’s largest agricultural companies scrambling to cut deals.
DuPont and Dow Chemical Co agreed in December to combine in an all-stock merger valued at $130 billion in a first step towards breaking up into three separate businesses, a move that was seen as a trigger for further consolidation.
Syngenta was advised by Dyalco, the one-man business of former Goldman Sachs M&A head Gordon Dyal, alongside JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs and UBS while HSBC and China CITIC Bank International